|

|
|
Click
on the month below for News / Events in 2001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
July
|
August
|
September
|
|
October
|
November
|
December
|
|
Click
on the month below for News / Events in 2000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allstate
Discount Request Enrages Shops
July
2001, Bodyshop Magazine
Allstate
Insurance Company of Canada recently asked its preferred collision
repair facilities in Ontario and New Brunswick to discount the prices
of replacement parts to the tune of 10% for domestic parts and 5%
for foreign parts.
The
alternative, industry insiders report, was to lose standing as a
preferred Allstate partner.
"For
the vast majority, refusing the concessions is not an option," John
Norris, executive director of the Hamilton Autobody Repairers Association
(HARA) insists. "Shops are so dependent upon the insurance industry
that losing preferred status would be devastating."
Already,
the industry is facing a dreary profitability picture. The hourly
labor rate has barely increased in ten years. Margins are currently
eked out of part sales, which to date has been a lone bright spot
for bottom line profits. But with overall margins already at 4%
across the country, this latest concession could hit shops hard.
For this very reason, and its reliance upon the insurance industry,
shop owners are afraid to speak out on record against the proposed
discount.
One
Ontario shop owner says Allstate has stated their proposal is non-negotiable
and that many shops will be forced to resort to creatively shifting
estimate costs in order to make lost monies back.
Another
operator says since the proposed discount is for new parts only,
more repair shops will favor used parts, or allocate more labor
hours into repairing damaged cars that would otherwise have received
new parts. "I don't want to put new parts on Allstate cars anymore,"
says an angry Central Ontario shop owner. "I will do everything
I can to avoid using new parts. I'll make back the money they are
taking from me in other ways." In other words, shops that are intent
upon retaining profits will opt for higher margin repairs or switch
to used parts. Workmanship could suffer and the eventual resale
of repaired cars -- no longer outfitted with new parts -- could
diminish.
|

Mike
Haskell
|

John
Norris
|
Norris
does not believe most shops will resort to such unethical practices.
"Still, the opportunity and the desire to walk down that path will
now be greater than it ever has been," he adds. For its part, Allstate
refuses to talk about confidential agreements.
Michael
Haskell, Allstate Canada's president, says discounts are proposed
to save claim costs and enhance company profitability for shareholders.
Haskell refuses to comment upon the potential that bodyshops may
cost-shift in an attempt to make back profits. "The ultimate question
is to speculate on how bodyshops are going to react, and that's
something I cannot do."
Bodyshop
operators fear discount concessions will bring forward other insurers
lining up for a similar deal. "The biggest fear is that now every
insurance company will start asking for the same discount on the
basis of the Allstate deal."
Faced
with that possibility, one bodyshop owner insists options are limited
heading into the future. "If all the major insurance companies start
asking for this program, we are not going to be around in five years,"
he says.
|
|
IBC
Says Auto Insurance Costs Continue Upward Spiral
Tuesday,
July 17, 2001, Collisionweek Magazine
The
Insurance Bureau of Canada (IBC) yesterday released its most recent
Atlantic region figures for 1999 and 2000, confirming the steadily
worsening losses being incurred on automobile insurance.
"Our
actuarial estimates confirm the trends we've seen in recent years
are continuing," said Don Forgeron, regional vice-president of the
IBC. "Costs continue to increase significantly, all of which will
soon negatively impact motorists in every province in the region."
In
2000, losses incurred by the auto insurance industry in Atlantic
Canada were about $190 million. In 1999, the industry increased
its original loss estimate to $150 million from $100 million. Analysts
predict a continued rise in costs unless changes are made to the
current auto insurance products offered.
"For
several years, the average cost per claim rose while the frequency
of claims and accidents fell," said Mr. Forgeron. "In recent years,
the frequency of claims has started to rise again, creating the
worst possible scenario, a higher average cost per claim and more
of them."
Research
shows that the types of claims with the greatest increase in cost
are soft tissue injuries such as neck strains and sprains. Most
the claims that are paid in these cases do not compensate the victim
for what has been lost, but rather for pain and suffering. Research
is now underway to help the industry determine the reasons why costs
continue to rise, confirm the types of injuries that are contributing
most to the current high costs, and look at the distribution of
these costs. The bureau is also surveying public opinion to find
out the level of understanding of industry issues and the tolerance
for changes to auto insurance products.
"As
consumers feel the effects of these rising costs over the next six
to 18 months, government and industry leaders will be called upon
to respond," added Mr. Forgeron. "In addition to meeting with government
officials to ensure that they fully understand the problem, we're
working to provide a range of solutions."
The
bureau is working with governments to develop various options to
reform the current auto insurance product so that costs remain stable
and accident victims can be fairly compensated and in a way that
is consistent with the views of Atlantic Canadians. Consumers can
contact the bureau's consumer information center in Halifax if they
have questions about their home or car insurance. The center can
be reached at (902) 429-2730 or toll-free at 1-800-565-7189.
The
Insurance Bureau of Canada is the national trade association of
the private property and casualty insurance industry. It represents
about 200 companies that provide more than 90 per cent of the non-government
home, car and business insurance sold in Canada.
Copyright
2001 by CollisionWeek. All rights reserved. No part of this publication
may be reproduced or transmitted by any means without permission
in writing from the publisher.
|
|
APPRENTICESHIP
RETENTION STUDY RELEASED FOR SKILLED TRADES
Over
350 apprentices surveyed for job retention factors
July
16, 2001
The
results of a six month study of skilled trades apprentices, including
the collision repair trade, shows that the biggest factors in retaining
an apprentice were appreciation for a job well done and that they
liked their co-workers. Wages were sixth on the list.
The
study "Apprentice Retention in the Skilled Trades" was commissioned
by the Industry Education Council of Hamilton and conducted by the
Sir Wilfred Laurier University Business Consulting Program and funded
by Human Resources Development Canada.
The
350 apprentices interviewed told the survey team that 30% had already
switched employers at least once. Some interesting facts:
- 98%
were male with 50% under25 years of age.
- 53%
believe it would be easy or very easy to get another job in their
trade.
- 68%
were earning annual salaries in the range of $20,000 to $39,000
- 60%
thought they were fairly paid by their employer.
- 85%
expressed satisfaction with their skilled trade career choice,
so retention is not related to overall career satisfaction as
it is related to satisfaction with a specific place of employment.
Some
further results:
- Apprentices
want to be appreciated by their employer.
- Over
65% ranked "liking the people they work with" as the number one
reason they stay with their employers.
- 74%
said loyalty increases with job satisfaction.
- 93%
of apprentices are proud of the work they do. They saw positive,
effective and constructive communication as central to good management.
- Apprentices
stay with employers who give them a level of responsibility equal
to their ability.
-
Apprentices want to work in a safe environment and produce products
and services that are not harmful to the consumer.
The study is now available on line at www.skilledtrades.ca
or at www.skilledtrades.ca/assets/forum/st_report_summary.pdf
It can also be accessed on the collision repair industry site at
www.ciia.com under "Training"
|
|
The
Art of Earning-Hi-Tech Careers in the Collision Repair Industry
Local
association helps produce and distribute CD-ROM
July
14, 2001
The
Collision Industry Action Group is proud to announce that the new
CD-ROM on attracting new workers to the trade is now available.
"The
Art of Earning" is a new CD-ROM visual tool that provides information
on careers available in the collision repair industry and successfully
promotes a positive industry image.
The
beta version of the CD-ROM was shown by Co-Chair of the Attracting
and Retaining People Committee of the Canadian Collision Industry
Forum, CIAG's John Norris, to audiences in Winnipeg and Calgary
and shown to the industry for the first time in its bi-lingual version
in Montreal in May, 2001. Just recently released by the Automotive
Industries Association and the Canadian Collision Industry Forum(CCIF)
the CD-ROM is designed for viewing at school skills days, shop open
houses and through apprenticeship branch offices throughout Canada.
The idea for a CD-based presentation tool came from the AIA Paint,
Body and Equipment Council members after they received numerous
requests from high schools to visit and speak to students about
the collision repair business. Council members soon realized that
they needed an effective visual tool to assist them to deliver a
clear message to young people.
The
presentation includes information on training, skills ands salaries.
As well, a virtual shop tour, interviews with apprentices, technicians,
and shop managers and a full "next steps" section provides opportunities
for learning about the trade.
"Our
goal is to get a copy of this CD-ROM out to all levels of the repair
industry. With this kind of tool available we can now begin to take
the industry into the classroom to address key industry challenges
of recruitment and industry image", stated Ken Friesen, Chairman
of CCIF
Copies
of the cd-rom are available from AIA Canada at (613) 728-5821 .
As well, copies have been forwarded to trade associations across
the country, government apprenticeship offices and community colleges
that deliver collision repair training in Canada.
|
|
INDUSTRY
ASSOCIATION SUCCEEDS IN CHANGING WSIB POLICY
No
penalties, interest if shops register now
July
12, 2001
After
lobbying for the change in penalty registration process throughout
last year, the collision repair industry trade associations are
pleased to announce that the Workplace Safety and Insurance Board
(WSIB) has now accepted our position.
This
new policy from WSIB means that any employer who was not previously
registered with the Board can now contact the Board voluntarily
and will only need to pay premiums retroactive as far back as January
1, 2001.
Previously,
the Board had insisted that shops be charged for up to the last
seven years of missing premium remittance.
WSIB
has adopted this position in order to accommodate unregistered shops
, but just for a limited time.
WSIB
has agreed that they will not charge a voluntarily registering facility
any premiums due from a previous year, and they will waive all penalties,
interest and provincial offenses charges associated with the registration.
Registering
your collision repair business with the Board is a legal requirement
and included as a mandatory portion of both the Toronto shop accreditation
program and the new CISCO self-management accreditation proposal.
Shops
that do not step forward to register, will be subject to investigation
by the WSIB Special Investigations Branch and may be charged the
outstanding amount due on all premiums, plus interest and penalties
Also
shops may also be found guilty of a provincial offense and fined
up to $25,000 (up to $100,000 if a corporation) or put in jail for
up to six months.
All
unregistered shops are urged to register with WSIB as soon as possible.
|
|
CANADIANS
AMONG GLOBAL AUTOMOTIVE SCHOLARSHIP RECIPIENTS
Collision
repair students among winners
July
12, 2001
A
total of 132 students will receive the annual Global Aftermarket
Symposium Scholarship in 2001, including 20 Canadian students from
schools across the country. The Global Automotive Aftermarket Symposium
Scholarship is funded through proceeds from the annual Global Automotive
Aftermarket Symposium. The two-day program brings together numerous
industry executives to examine issues and trends facing the aftermarket.
The
scholarships are focused on providing assistance to individuals
pursuing automotive studies at technical colleges and vocational
schools or college-level programs.
The
scholarship is unique in that students may receive two financial
grants: one to assist in tuition payments while they are in school;
and an equivalent matching grant for all scholarship recipients
who graduate from their program. Graduates must provide proof of
employment in the automotive aftermarket for at least six months
following graduation.
The
Co-Chair of the Attracting and Retaining People Committee of the
Canadian Collision Industry Forum (CCIF), John Norris, advises that
their Committee is looking very seriously at these scholarships
with a view to encouraging industry donations across Canada. The
issue is on the agenda of the CCIF meeting on July 21 in Vancouver.
The
Canadian recipients are:
- Deanna
Barth, Edmonton, Alberta
- Alberta
Tara Cooper, London, Ontario
- Alicia
Corey, New Minas, Nova Scotia
- Erin
Friesen, Surrey, B.C.
- Julie
Gagnon, Chicoutimi, Quebec
- Jennifer
Gatschene, Orillia, Ontario
- Catherine
Goudreau, Laval, Quebec
- Chris
Hopkins, Saskatoon, Sask.
- Michael
Horm, Westbank, B.C.
- Robyn
Jutras, Burnaby, B.C.
- Allison
Kennedy, Hampton, N.B.
- Pamela
Kinch, Summerland B.C.
- Hemraj
R. Kishun, Toronto, Ontario
- David.
C. Nelson, Minnedosa, Manitoba
- Adam
Nicholls, Brandon, Manitoba
- Keith
Nicholls, Ottawa, Ontario
- Mathew
Spence, Vancouver, B.C.
- Paul
Vaillancourt, Ottawa, Ontario
- Jeff
Young, Stephenville, Nfld
- Ryan
Young, Barrie, Ontario
|
|
HAMILTON
POLICE HAVE STOLEN AIR BAGS- LOOKING FOR OWNERS
July
11, 2001
Hamilton
police have seized a number of surgically removed stolen vehicle
air bags as part of an investigation into the recovery of about
$50,000 worth of electronic equipment and other goods.
A
21 year old Granville Avenue, Hamilton man is facing numerous charges
in connection with the thefts. Immigration Canada has also issued
a warrant to deport the accused who has been living in Hamilton
illegally for three years- to Poland once the charges have been
resolved.
The
man was arrested after returning to a Future Shop store and requesting
to see in the box of a Sony PlayStation game that he had just returned.
Inside the box was a loaded .22 caliber semi-automatic handgun.
The
accused is also wanted in Chicago for burglary, weapons and drug
offenses.
Hamilton
Police are looking for the owners of seven air bags, including:
- Mazda-driver's
side
- Mazda-passenger
side
- Ford
Probe-driver's side-black
- Pontiac-driver's
side-black
- Pontiac-driver's
side-grey
and
two unidentifiable surgically removed passenger side air bags.
If
you think one of these air bags is yours, or you have paid out a
claim on these bags and want them back, please call Defectives Peter
Thom or Ron Collingwood at ----(905) 546-2905
|
|
Competition
Bureau Charges New Brunswick Chemical Company
OTTAWA,
July 10, 2001
The
Competition Bureau announced today that charges have been laid against
Laurentide Atlantic Limited of Richibucto, New Brunswick for misleading
the public.
The
charges allege misleading information on labels of various lines
of paint. Following an investigation, the Bureau found that labels
did not accurately reflect the amount of paint in the packages,
contrary to section 7.(1) of the Consumer Packaging and Labelling
Act. Labels help consumers make informed choices.
The
Competition Bureau is an independent law enforcement agency that
ensures all Canadians enjoy the benefits of a competitive economy,
low prices, product choice and quality service. It oversees the
application of the Competition Act, the Consumer Packaging and Labelling
Act, the Textile Labelling Act and the Precious Metals Marking Act.
|
|
I-CAN
PRESS RELEASE STATE FARM CRIMINAL FRAUD CONVICTION UPHELD PENALTY
REDUCED TO $1.056 BILLION U.S.
July
1st 2001
In a fourty page decision, issued on April 5, 2001 the Fifth District
Appellate Court of Illinois upheld the criminal fraud conviction
of State Farm Insurance for having mandated the use of inferior
aftermarket crash parts in the repair of consumers' vehicles. While
upholding the trial court conviction, the appellate court determined
there was an over-lap of financial penalties and reduced the original
trial court award of $1.186 billion (plus accruing interest). This
net remaining award is one of the largest verdicts ever upheld on
appeal and represents an average reimbursement of $223.40 (U.S.)
for each of the 4.7 million members of the plaintiff class.
The
class members in this case are defined as U.S. residents (except
those in Arkansas and Tennessee) who were insured by State Farm,
made a claim for vehicle repairs under their policy between July
28, 1994 and February 23, 1998 and either had Aftermarket Crash
Parts installed in their vehicles or received compensation based
upon the cost of such parts. Employees of State Farm, its officers,
its directors, its affiliates and residents of California with policies
issued or executed prior to September 2, 1996 are excluded from
this class. The full fourty page decision can be assessed online
at www.lchb.com/images/state_farm.pdf State Farm may now petition
the Illinois Supreme Court for review. If that petition for review
is denied, or if it is accepted and State Farm were to lose at that
level, State Farm could then apply for review to the United States
Supreme Court. The U.S. Supreme Court had previously denied State
Farm's petition to review the class certification of this case.
Elizabeth J. Cabraser, one of the trial and appellate attorneys
for the plaintiff class, has commented on this decision saying "
the appeals court opinion was a victory for consumers who are unable
to obtain meaningful relief from large corporations on their own
and a vindication of the class action device."
In
its opinion upholding the trail court's verdict, the appellate court
noted that" State Farms' guarantee that it would replace non-OEM
parts at no cost to the unsatisfied policyholder upon demand was
bogus" The opinion went on to say "State Farm 's promise to pay
for parts of "Like Kind and Quality" to restore a vehicle to its
pre-loss condition" was breached when it specified and paid for
inferior non-OEM parts." It is no a mater of legal record. Aftermarket
Crash Parts are deemed "inferior" to OEM Crash Parts !
PREMIUMS:
The
appellate court opinion went on to say " State Farms' actuary testified
that any damages awarded would be paid from the company's reserves
and would not affect premiums and that the amount awarded would
not affect the company's financial viability or its ability to pay
dividends or future claims."
The
Insurance Consumer Advocate Network (I-Can) views this on-the-record
testimony from State Farms' own actuary as flying in the face of
the auto insurance industry's continuous assertions that legislative
restrictions on the use of Aftermarket Crash Parts would result
in auto insurance premium increases. Auto insurance lobbyists freely
distribute anecdotal comments to legislators about premium increases
when not under oath. However, State Farms' premium calculator expert
(actuary) testifies under oath that NO PREMIUM INCREASE would be
necessary. I-Can is inclined to believe the under-oath testimony
of State Farms own actuary. This is especially true in light on
the fact that State Farm, with a $1.186 billion judgement against
them, and having already abandoned the practice of specifying the
use of Aftermarket Crash Parts, declared a record $1 billion Premium
Refund Dividend to be returned to their policyholders in June 2000
(eight months after the trial court decision)
|
|
HARA
Hamilton District Autobody Repair Association
"To represent the best interests of the industry, providing
opportunities for growth for environmentally sound, profitable businesses
having competent and trained professionals serving the public."
WE'VE
MOVED (as of February 1, 2001)
HARA's
new office address is:
|
HAMILTON
DISTRICT AUTOBODY REPAIR ASSOCIATION
|
|
MOTIVE
POWER/COLLISION REPAIR TRAINING CENTRE
|
|
481
Barton Street East, D 206,
|
|
Stoney
Creek, Ontario, Canada
|
|
L8E
2L7
|
|
|
|
Our
NEW PHONE (905) 662-9499
|
|
Our
NEW FAX (905) 662-9502
|
| |
|
The
following remain the same:
|
|
Mailing
address:
|
|
P.O.
Box 47594, Centre Mall, Hamilton,On L8H 7S7
|
|
Toll
free: 1-800-318-DENT (3368)
|
|
|
|