Collision Industry Action Group
Autobody Repairs
Mechanical Repairs
Suppliers
Specialized Services
Consumer Info
Insurance
Training
News / Events
PartsTrader
Discussion / Forum
Publications
Contact Us / Questions
Join / Membership
Members Only
Links to Sites
Environment
Employment
Solvents
Inspection Stations
Insight
Collision Week
CCIF
UPCR

 

News, Events,Canada

 

Click on the month below for News / Events in 2001
August
September
October
November
December
Click on the month below for News / Events in 2000
In order of most recent

 

January 2001

 

SCRS Charts Demonstrate Paint Costs Increases & Unfairness of Arbitrary Formulas Used to Calculate Charges

January 2001

The Society of Collision Repair Specialists (SCRS) continues its work to educate collision repair professionals, insurance company claims personnel, and state insurance departments on the true costs of paint and materials and to bring equity and fairness to the process of calculating these charges.

One of these efforts includes SCRS's work to identify which state insurance departments disallow the practice of placing an arbitrary cap or threshold on the charges for paint and materials. Another important SCRS project is to publish charts demonstrating the annual increases in the costs of refinish materials. Shops and insurers can then use this information to demonstrate the need to adjust the rates in order to cover the regular cost increases applied by the paint manufacturers.

SCRS's most recent charts compare the cost increases from 1999 to 2000 for refinish materials that are manufactured by five major suppliers: Akzo Sikkens, BASF, DuPont, ICI Autocolor, PPG Industries, and Sherwin Williams. There are two separate charts-one is for materials used in areas that comply with the Environmental Protection Agency's National Rule limiting the content of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and one for those areas (primarily in California) that are restricted to using products that have VOC limits lower than the National Rule.

"SCRS publishes these charts every year," explains SCRS Chairman Gene Hamilton, "because we understand how easy it is to lose sight of the hard costs for paint and materials. Paint suppliers don't issue itemized invoices for paint and materials for each vehicle as it is done for the other parts of the repair. This situation is compounded by the fact that historically, shops have been forced to calculate charges for paint and materials based on an arbitrary formula - the paint labor hours of the job multiplied by an arbitrary dollar figure. On top of that, the dollar figure can vary from region to region-$14 here or $22 there-in spite of the fact that the manufacturer costs are the same for each paint and material product throughout the country.

"There are several other factors that affect the cost of paint and materials," Hamilton continues. "For one, there are vehicles that require more expensive multi-stage coatings, special colors, iridescents or pearls. Repairers are also faced with the dilemma that the number of hours for refinish labor has been reduced over the last five years due to the technology improvements. At the same time, no adjustments were made to the 'formula' to reflect this in spite of the fact that the amount of materials used has remained the same and the costs of materials has increased. This system is inadequate and is responsible for not only eroding profits, but in many cases it does not allow for enough money to pay the repairer's costs."

"Another problem encountered by the shops is the arbitrary limitation placed by the insurance company on what they charge," states SCRS Executive Director John Loftus. "Call it a cap or call it a threshold, the result is often insufficient. Some of these caps were set in 1996 at anywhere from $175 to $350. The cost of paints and materials has increased an average of 8 percent each year, which means the $350 limit of 1996 should by $514 in 2001. But insurers still continue to use the old figures, which contribute to friction and cost shifting."

SCRS recommends that repairers document their costs for these materials. One way is with the help of the paint jobber or with computer systems provided by the paint manufacturers. The Mitchell Refinishing Materials Guide, the Mitchell Refinishing Materials Calculator, ComputerLogic's PaintLogic, and the PaintEX information systems are other reliable resources. These guides and systems are being used successfully throughout the country. The state insurance departments of New York and Nebraska say that a guide is an acceptable method to calculate paint and material charges. Members of SCRS and its affiliate associations can purchase the Mitchell Refinishing Materials Guide at a $30 saving and the Calculator at a $100 saving.

"SCRS is grateful to all of the participating paint manufacturers," says Loftus. "We could not accomplish a project of this scope and credibility without their cooperation."

The Paint & Material Cost Charts are attached to this press release. For more copies or further information, call SCRS at 509-547-0445 or fax 509-547-0446 or send email to scrs1@aol.com. Additional information about SCRS, including news releases, is available at the SCRS web site (http://www.scrs.com).

Through its direct members and 32 affiliate associations, SCRS is comprised of 8,900 collision repair businesses and 75,200 specialized professionals who work with consumers and insurance companies to repair collision-damaged vehicles.

 

 

Aftermarket Parts Lawsuits Hit Canada

AXA Canada and ING Canada named in class action IBC to look at insurance company practices

Monday, January 3, 2000

Insurance companies in Canada are starting to feel the impact of the U.S. aftermarket parts class action trial that ended October 8th in Illinois with a $1.18 billion award against State Farm .

Some recent Canadian events:

  • A class action style lawsuit has been filed in Quebec against Groupe Desjardins, ING Canada (the second largest auto insurer in Canada) and AXA Canada (seventh largest) relating to their use of non-OE parts.
  • The Insurance Bureau of Canada (IBC) has asked its Ontario claims committee to look at their current practices with respect to aftermarket parts and develop a sound position on the issue.
  • The Automotive Industries Association of Canada (AlA), representing automotive manufacturers and suppliers in Canada, is urging full disclosure to consumers of the aftermarket status of any collision repair part, and worries that all aftermarket manufacturers will be tarred with the same brush. Ray Datt, AlA president said "We worry about insurers dictating to body shops on price rather than proper fit. In some cases an aftermarket part is fine; in other cases it isn't."
  • Both State Farm and Liberty Mutual Insurance have announced a prohibition on using some or all non-OE crash parts on vehicles repaired in Ontario. Liberty Mutual Insurance is one of nine insurers named in aftermarket parts class action suits in the United States.
  • Transport Canada is being requested by a trade association in Alberta to prohibit importation of possibly unsafe aftermarket parts and stop them from entering Canada.
  • A group in Ontario is demanding that Transport Canada provide for recalls of unsafe structural aftermarket parts in the same fashion that OEM parts are recalled. Aftermarket mechanical parts manufactured by such brand name companies as Monroe and Moog Canada have previously been subject to Transport Canada recall.